Page 491
ERGONFIAS OLLICOL EO Wasiq ancp comberesfion!
bald doldw anot‡singer bus nelut sɗt etuloade galeď viqqs ton bib moltalbatist bad afrooƉ sɗð móde 19VO TI on VIjngupaanoo Jadd has rest120 svijuosmï dose as romi evaef tot moltsɔtiqqa ed3 to gaitnsız sɗð bæetta bluow
doldw at molttaoq stanudrotas add ot galtalar atost -awa evad yedt egamab auotes and bra besalq need svad datя to moitite¶ ed‡ mort æraeqqa noktatalosi syari szedt noktite¶ tad‡ mt two jea #isulaV edt to somebive
dotdw moqu anoijalvoLas edt at ebam Tomie emoa need beaad saw ynoX gook to romısvoð gattoå remot sɗt yď bab
*
sgist now consequent upon the Judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and ask you to be good enough to let us know whether our Clients' Petition of Right may now be brought before the King for His Majesty's further consideration and if so whether that Petition should be amended by adding a Statement of the circumstances under which the Judicial Committee decided to refuse to grant leave to appeal, or whether we should in the first place again address the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies upon the subject in its present position which we will gladly do it, in your opinion, you consider such a course desirable in our Clients' interest.
We would refer you to the following passage from the judgment of Chief Justice Carrington which shows that there are just complaints as to the way the enquiry was conducted by the Attorney General Before making his award:--
"It was very properly admitted by the Attorney General that if the Severner is indeed an arbitrator under the Ordinance, some things which are stated to have been done by the Acting Governor cannot be supported, and the Court will be justified in interfering in the exercise of its general jurisdiction over subordinate tribunals”.
We have the honour to be,
Sir,
Your most Obedient Servants,
Trass & Taylor.
Charles S. Murdoch Esq.,
Assistant Under Secretary,
Home Office,
Whitehall.
Page 491
GeA
491
asw Lŝeqqa of evsel tot nolisoliqqa doua yɗw noɑadı aɗf somantb10 nottamalosh syæri¶ edt rebru tadt ad of azeeqa Jdəti~£syəI *æjasif) two 8 mottoendeƐ ↑ noktaeƐ groë z yd bonfstava svad yedt segamab edt not noitaansqman of m rezat estt kmmo✪ Istokbub sdt to motniqo edt at now gold
edt gairewoqme mot‡ɔseduž jed‡ mt abrow adt jadł To genom to mua a dove meɗt biawa od ‚tit idgwodt ad moldexoeib etuloeds aid at tégla ed as brai wex to sasaŭ
Ledð beðut it aros - moltseneqmod to yew yd ban na dan ke
Jadt Jud
ERGONFIAS OLLICOL EO Wasiq ancp comberesfion!
bald doldw anot‡singer bus nelut sɗt etuloade galeď viqqs ton bib moltalbatist bad afrooƉ sɗð móde 19VO TI on VIjngupaanoo Jadd has rest120 svijuosmï dose as romi evaef tot moltsɔtiqqa ed3 to gaitnsız sɗð bæetta bluow
doldw at molttaoq stanudrotas add ot galtalar atost -awa evad yedt egamab auotes and bra besalq need svad datя to moitite¶ ed‡ mort æraeqqa noktatalosi syari szedt noktite¶ tad‡ mt two jea #isulaV edt to somebive
dotdw moqu anoijalvoLas edt at ebam Tomie emoa need beaad saw ynoX gook to romısvoð gattoå remot sɗt yď bab
Jaegerq edt sapaoed beititoer deg oð eldanu 978 ent yd beblseb rettam a al sistratat ton LLkw gnol yaci vino 31 ‚vignorw babłosb,ałatałem sw as dyrodtls T vent as eboned aœvor to edt oð noktnetta quog warb of
*
sgist now consequent upon the Judgment of the Judicial Committee
of, the Privy Council and ask you to be good enough to let us know whether our Clients' Petition of Right may now be brought before the King for His Majesty's further consideration and if so whether that Fetition should be amended by adding a Statement of the cir-
cumstances under which the Judicial Committee decided to refuse to
grant leave to appeal, or whether we should in the first place „again address the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the
Colonies #pon the subject in its present position which we will
gladly do it, in your opinion, you consider such a course desirable
in our Clients' interest.
We would refer you to the following passage from the -judgment of Chief Justice Carrington which shows that there are just
complaints as to the way the enquiry was conducted by the Attorney General Before making his s««rd:--
*
"It was ver properly admitted by the Attorney General *that if the Severner is indeed an arbitrator under the Ordinance, *some amade things which are stated to have been done by the Acting 16:-ernor cannot be supported, and the Court will be justified in *interfering in the exercise of its general jurisdiction over subor- "dinate tribunals”.
We have the honour to be,
(8¢
Charles S. Murdoch leg.,
Assistent Under Secretary,
Home Office,
Whitehall,
Sir,
Your moat Obedient Servants,
Trass & Taylor..
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.