CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12] — Page 497

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Page 491

ERGONFIAS OLLICOL EO Wasiq ancp comberesfion!

bald doldw anot‡singer bus nelut sɗt etuloade galeď viqqs ton bib moltalbatist bad afrooƉ sɗð móde 19VO TI on VIjngupaanoo Jadd has rest120 svijuosmï dose as romi evaef tot moltsɔtiqqa ed3 to gaitnsız sɗð bæetta bluow

doldw at molttaoq stanudrotas add ot galtalar atost -awa evad yedt egamab auotes and bra besalq need svad datя to moitite¶ ed‡ mort æraeqqa noktatalosi syari szedt noktite¶ tad‡ mt two jea #isulaV edt to somebive

dotdw moqu anoijalvoLas edt at ebam Tomie emoa need beaad saw ynoX gook to romısvoð gattoå remot sɗt yď bab

*

sgist now consequent upon the Judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and ask you to be good enough to let us know whether our Clients' Petition of Right may now be brought before the King for His Majesty's further consideration and if so whether that Petition should be amended by adding a Statement of the circumstances under which the Judicial Committee decided to refuse to grant leave to appeal, or whether we should in the first place again address the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies upon the subject in its present position which we will gladly do it, in your opinion, you consider such a course desirable in our Clients' interest.

We would refer you to the following passage from the judgment of Chief Justice Carrington which shows that there are just complaints as to the way the enquiry was conducted by the Attorney General Before making his award:--

"It was very properly admitted by the Attorney General that if the Severner is indeed an arbitrator under the Ordinance, some things which are stated to have been done by the Acting Governor cannot be supported, and the Court will be justified in interfering in the exercise of its general jurisdiction over subordinate tribunals”.

We have the honour to be,

Sir,

Your most Obedient Servants,

Trass & Taylor.

Charles S. Murdoch Esq.,

Assistant Under Secretary,

Home Office,

Whitehall.

Page 491

Edit History

2026-06-01 11:57:41 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Page 491 ERGONFIAS OLLICOL EO Wasiq ancp comberesfion! bald doldw anot‡singer bus nelut sɗt etuloade galeď viqqs ton bib moltalbatist bad afrooƉ sɗð móde 19VO TI on VIjngupaanoo Jadd has rest120 svijuosmï dose as romi evaef tot moltsɔtiqqa ed3 to gaitnsız sɗð bæetta bluow doldw at molttaoq stanudrotas add ot galtalar atost -awa evad yedt egamab auotes and bra besalq need svad datя to moitite¶ ed‡ mort æraeqqa noktatalosi syari szedt noktite¶ tad‡ mt two jea #isulaV edt to somebive dotdw moqu anoijalvoLas edt at ebam Tomie emoa need beaad saw ynoX gook to romısvoð gattoå remot sɗt bab * sgist now consequent upon the Judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and ask you to be good enough to let us know whether our Clients' Petition of Right may now be brought before the King for His Majesty's further consideration and if so whether that Petition should be amended by adding a Statement of the circumstances under which the Judicial Committee decided to refuse to grant leave to appeal, or whether we should in the first place again address the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies upon the subject in its present position which we will gladly do it, in your opinion, you consider such a course desirable in our Clients' interest. We would refer you to the following passage from the judgment of Chief Justice Carrington which shows that there are just complaints as to the way the enquiry was conducted by the Attorney General Before making his award:-- "It was very properly admitted by the Attorney General that if the Severner is indeed an arbitrator under the Ordinance, some things which are stated to have been done by the Acting Governor cannot be supported, and the Court will be justified in interfering in the exercise of its general jurisdiction over subordinate tribunals”. We have the honour to be, Sir, Your most Obedient Servants, Trass & Taylor. Charles S. Murdoch Esq., Assistant Under Secretary, Home Office, Whitehall. Page 491
Baseline (Original)
GeA 491 asw Lŝeqqa of evsel tot nolisoliqqa doua yɗw noɑadı aɗf somantb10 nottamalosh syæri¶ edt rebru tadt ad of azeeqa Jdəti~£syəI *æjasif) two 8 mottoendeƐ noktaeƐ groë z yd bonfstava svad yedt segamab edt not noitaansqman of m rezat estt kmmo✪ Istokbub sdt to motniqo edt at now gold edt gairewoqme mot‡ɔseduž jed‡ mt abrow adt jadł To genom to mua a dove meɗt biawa od ‚tit idgwodt ad moldexoeib etuloeds aid at tégla ed as brai wex to sasaŭ Ledð beðut it aros - moltseneqmod to yew yd ban na dan ke Jadt Jud ERGONFIAS OLLICOL EO Wasiq ancp comberesfion! bald doldw anot‡singer bus nelut sɗt etuloade galeď viqqs ton bib moltalbatist bad afrooƉ sɗð móde 19VO TI on VIjngupaanoo Jadd has rest120 svijuosmï dose as romi evaef tot moltsɔtiqqa ed3 to gaitnsız sɗð bæetta bluow doldw at molttaoq stanudrotas add ot galtalar atost -awa evad yedt egamab auotes and bra besalq need svad datя to moitite¶ ed‡ mort æraeqqa noktatalosi syari szedt noktite¶ tad‡ mt two jea #isulaV edt to somebive dotdw moqu anoijalvoLas edt at ebam Tomie emoa need beaad saw ynoX gook to romısvoð gattoå remot sɗt bab Jaegerq edt sapaoed beititoer deg eldanu 978 ent yd beblseb rettam a al sistratat ton LLkw gnol yaci vino 31 ‚vignorw babłosb,ałatałem sw as dyrodtls T vent as eboned aœvor to edt noktnetta quog warb of * sgist now consequent upon the Judgment of the Judicial Committee of, the Privy Council and ask you to be good enough to let us know whether our Clients' Petition of Right may now be brought before the King for His Majesty's further consideration and if so whether that Fetition should be amended by adding a Statement of the cir- cumstances under which the Judicial Committee decided to refuse to grant leave to appeal, or whether we should in the first place „again address the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies #pon the subject in its present position which we will gladly do it, in your opinion, you consider such a course desirable in our Clients' interest. We would refer you to the following passage from the -judgment of Chief Justice Carrington which shows that there are just complaints as to the way the enquiry was conducted by the Attorney General Before making his s««rd:-- * "It was ver properly admitted by the Attorney General *that if the Severner is indeed an arbitrator under the Ordinance, *some amade things which are stated to have been done by the Acting 16:-ernor cannot be supported, and the Court will be justified in *interfering in the exercise of its general jurisdiction over subor- "dinate tribunals”. We have the honour to be, (8¢ Charles S. Murdoch leg., Assistent Under Secretary, Home Office, Whitehall, Sir, Your moat Obedient Servants, Trass & Taylor..
2026-06-01 11:57:41 · Baseline
View content

GeA

491

asw Lŝeqqa of evsel tot nolisoliqqa doua yɗw noɑadı aɗf somantb10 nottamalosh syæri¶ edt rebru tadt ad of azeeqa Jdəti~£syəI *æjasif) two 8 mottoendeƐ ↑ noktaeƐ groë z yd bonfstava svad yedt segamab edt not noitaansqman of m rezat estt kmmo✪ Istokbub sdt to motniqo edt at now gold

edt gairewoqme mot‡ɔseduž jed‡ mt abrow adt jadł To genom to mua a dove meɗt biawa od ‚tit idgwodt ad moldexoeib etuloeds aid at tégla ed as brai wex to sasaŭ

Ledð beðut it aros - moltseneqmod to yew yd ban na dan ke

Jadt Jud

ERGONFIAS OLLICOL EO Wasiq ancp comberesfion!

bald doldw anot‡singer bus nelut sɗt etuloade galeď viqqs ton bib moltalbatist bad afrooƉ sɗð móde 19VO TI on VIjngupaanoo Jadd has rest120 svijuosmï dose as romi evaef tot moltsɔtiqqa ed3 to gaitnsız sɗð bæetta bluow

doldw at molttaoq stanudrotas add ot galtalar atost -awa evad yedt egamab auotes and bra besalq need svad datя to moitite¶ ed‡ mort æraeqqa noktatalosi syari szedt noktite¶ tad‡ mt two jea #isulaV edt to somebive

dotdw moqu anoijalvoLas edt at ebam Tomie emoa need beaad saw ynoX gook to romısvoð gattoå remot sɗt yď bab

Jaegerq edt sapaoed beititoer deg oð eldanu 978 ent yd beblseb rettam a al sistratat ton LLkw gnol yaci vino 31 ‚vignorw babłosb,ałatałem sw as dyrodtls T vent as eboned aœvor to edt oð noktnetta quog warb of

*

sgist now consequent upon the Judgment of the Judicial Committee

of, the Privy Council and ask you to be good enough to let us know whether our Clients' Petition of Right may now be brought before the King for His Majesty's further consideration and if so whether that Fetition should be amended by adding a Statement of the cir-

cumstances under which the Judicial Committee decided to refuse to

grant leave to appeal, or whether we should in the first place „again address the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the

Colonies #pon the subject in its present position which we will

gladly do it, in your opinion, you consider such a course desirable

in our Clients' interest.

We would refer you to the following passage from the -judgment of Chief Justice Carrington which shows that there are just

complaints as to the way the enquiry was conducted by the Attorney General Before making his s««rd:--

*

"It was ver properly admitted by the Attorney General *that if the Severner is indeed an arbitrator under the Ordinance, *some amade things which are stated to have been done by the Acting 16:-ernor cannot be supported, and the Court will be justified in *interfering in the exercise of its general jurisdiction over subor- "dinate tribunals”.

We have the honour to be,

(8¢

Charles S. Murdoch leg.,

Assistent Under Secretary,

Home Office,

Whitehall,

Sir,

Your moat Obedient Servants,

Trass & Taylor..

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.